Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Forum rules
This forum is run by the BATC (British Amateur Television Club), it is service made freely available to all interested parties, please do not abuse this privilege.
Thank you
This forum is run by the BATC (British Amateur Television Club), it is service made freely available to all interested parties, please do not abuse this privilege.
Thank you
- Wolfie G8VAT
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:56 am
Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
I have a small prime focus dish getting ready to use for 5.6GHz and I've come upon the inevitable problem of how to support the Antenna (a Log Periodic PCB AE) at the prime focus..
There are no supports or mountings at the moment, it is just a dish, nothing more, nothing less..
And I'm not one for big engineering solutions, cheep n cheerful will do, I already saw a couple of ideas for a pole mounting.
Of course I could just go get a small offset dish with an LNB Arm, pole mount and everything, and t'jobs a good 'un.. but I have enough stuff kicking around already so that's last resort.
Just wondering what examples of ingenuity you guys have come up with?
There are no supports or mountings at the moment, it is just a dish, nothing more, nothing less..
And I'm not one for big engineering solutions, cheep n cheerful will do, I already saw a couple of ideas for a pole mounting.
Of course I could just go get a small offset dish with an LNB Arm, pole mount and everything, and t'jobs a good 'un.. but I have enough stuff kicking around already so that's last resort.
Just wondering what examples of ingenuity you guys have come up with?
:
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Hi
About 20 years ago, I bolted 3 lengths of aluminium tube (flattened and drilled through at each end) as a sort of tripod to reach the focus of this 60cm dish. I use a flat plate at the focus to mount the 10 GHz horn as seen here, but I have another plate with a 2.4 GHz helical feed for the ISS HamTV. You could use a similar arrangement for your log periodic.
It was a rush job that I do not think would last, but it is still in one piece!
The semi-rigid is connected to a 5.6 GHz dipole at the feed point. Unbelievably it received G8GTZ at 80km.
Dave
About 20 years ago, I bolted 3 lengths of aluminium tube (flattened and drilled through at each end) as a sort of tripod to reach the focus of this 60cm dish. I use a flat plate at the focus to mount the 10 GHz horn as seen here, but I have another plate with a 2.4 GHz helical feed for the ISS HamTV. You could use a similar arrangement for your log periodic.
It was a rush job that I do not think would last, but it is still in one piece!
The semi-rigid is connected to a 5.6 GHz dipole at the feed point. Unbelievably it received G8GTZ at 80km.
Dave
- Attachments
-
- 6790467E-1C16-4863-BE50-D5756CA3BC8A.jpeg (507.63 KiB) Viewed 4562 times
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
There is also the "Penny Feed" which on 6cms would need a larger disc, and the Shepherds Crook. Both of these can be used with PCB antennas. Both suffer from feed blockage, which matters more with small dishes. A better way is to use an offset dish. Mount it 90 degrees to normal to allow it to point at the horizon. In all cases, pay attention to the F/D of the dish and the illumination efficiency. Best resource is W1GHZ online antenna book http://www.w1ghz.org/antbook/contents.htm
Mike
Mike
another question about dishes/feeds
Hi, all
I'm posting this here, at Noel's suggestion as it's vaguely related (I did start another thread, but I'll keep an eye on both places for replies).
***
Here's a general question about dishes for the consideration of the collective wisdom …
Apart from the obvious 'advantage' of being able to feed it from directly behind the dish, what are the advantages of cassegrain dishes? Any disadvantages?
Also, I'm getting conflicting info from Internet searches about what shape the main dish is - is it the same shape as a normal dish (ie parabolic)?
What I'm really asking, I suppose, is that if I have a cassegrain dish, can I remove the sub reflector and use it as a PF dish?
***
John
I'm posting this here, at Noel's suggestion as it's vaguely related (I did start another thread, but I'll keep an eye on both places for replies).
***
Here's a general question about dishes for the consideration of the collective wisdom …
Apart from the obvious 'advantage' of being able to feed it from directly behind the dish, what are the advantages of cassegrain dishes? Any disadvantages?
Also, I'm getting conflicting info from Internet searches about what shape the main dish is - is it the same shape as a normal dish (ie parabolic)?
What I'm really asking, I suppose, is that if I have a cassegrain dish, can I remove the sub reflector and use it as a PF dish?
***
John
- Wolfie G8VAT
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:56 am
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Shepherds crook sounds like something I had considered where Semi Rigid would come through the dish at some point and have a U bend just behind the Antenna.
Presumably it can enter from any angle but possibly not directly from the centre since it would then be in the line of radiation from the antenna
And I had forgotten all about "Penny feeds", I'll look at the website you linked at lunchtime.. (I should be working)
Thanks Guys?
Presumably it can enter from any angle but possibly not directly from the centre since it would then be in the line of radiation from the antenna
And I had forgotten all about "Penny feeds", I'll look at the website you linked at lunchtime.. (I should be working)
Thanks Guys?
:
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
- Wolfie G8VAT
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:56 am
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Gosh.. those guys know their stuff, much of which just went straight over my head.... You'll have to excuse my terminology, I see problems and solutions in a physical way, not by calculation or theory.
But, having had my brain fried (foom!) I think I see a shortcoming in my original plan.. although more knowledgeable folk might put me right..
Incoming signals are reflected from the whole of the dish to a Focus which is where the antenna should be located and they will arrive at all the angles determined by the dish and so not in the optimum direction for the antenna. Likewise for transmitting.. The antenna will direct the radiation along a narrow path to the rear of the dish, so my little Log Periodic PCB being a directional antenna is not going to be the best solution?
Perhaps I would be better with a simpler antenna, maybe just a dipole as in Dave's setup above?
But, having had my brain fried (foom!) I think I see a shortcoming in my original plan.. although more knowledgeable folk might put me right..
Incoming signals are reflected from the whole of the dish to a Focus which is where the antenna should be located and they will arrive at all the angles determined by the dish and so not in the optimum direction for the antenna. Likewise for transmitting.. The antenna will direct the radiation along a narrow path to the rear of the dish, so my little Log Periodic PCB being a directional antenna is not going to be the best solution?
Perhaps I would be better with a simpler antenna, maybe just a dipole as in Dave's setup above?
:
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
Re: another question about dishes/feeds
Quite a few advantages to the cassegrain, mostly not important for amateur radio. Large antennas, radio astronomy, extended F/D. Generally, though not always the reflector will be parabolic. It doesn't have to be but usually is. This means you can remove the plate and put an appropriate feed at the focus, which will not be where the sub-reflector was but some distance beyond. Are you sure it is not a Gregorian, not that that matters overly much.G8PEF wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 9:39 amHi, all
I'm posting this here, at Noel's suggestion as it's vaguely related (I did start another thread, but I'll keep an eye on both places for replies).
***
Here's a general question about dishes for the consideration of the collective wisdom …
Apart from the obvious 'advantage' of being able to feed it from directly behind the dish, what are the advantages of cassegrain dishes? Any disadvantages?
Also, I'm getting conflicting info from Internet searches about what shape the main dish is - is it the same shape as a normal dish (ie parabolic)?
What I'm really asking, I suppose, is that if I have a cassegrain dish, can I remove the sub reflector and use it as a PF dish?
***
John
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassegrain_antenna
You can also use a lens horn, or a horn antenna. Horn antennas are very easy to make, very good for short ranges but get a bit impractical at higher apertures. It's a good choice as a feed for a larger dish. Much better than a PCB antenna.
Mike
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Thanks, Mike.
I had made a guess that the biggest 'advantage' of dishes with sub reflectors was to give a bugger f/D ratio - but I'm not sure /why/ that's an advantage …
Re: cassegrain vs gregorian - how would I tell?
(EDIT: I've now read the link you posted and see that the difference is in whether the sub reflector is convex or concave. Mine is convex, so definitely cassegrain.)
I should add that the dish I have is about 900mm-1000mm diameter and originally had a 11GHz feed/LNB With a ferrite polarisation rotator fitted. To complicate matters, the subreflector is nutated.
I had made a guess that the biggest 'advantage' of dishes with sub reflectors was to give a bugger f/D ratio - but I'm not sure /why/ that's an advantage …
Re: cassegrain vs gregorian - how would I tell?
(EDIT: I've now read the link you posted and see that the difference is in whether the sub reflector is convex or concave. Mine is convex, so definitely cassegrain.)
I should add that the dish I have is about 900mm-1000mm diameter and originally had a 11GHz feed/LNB With a ferrite polarisation rotator fitted. To complicate matters, the subreflector is nutated.
Last edited by G8PEF on Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Hi Wolfie
You'll certainly do better with a log periodic at the feed than with a dipole. They are very broad, and you would lose over half the signal from a dipole as direct radiation from the front. My experience here is that it is better to get on and try something that might appear sub-optimal than to prevaricate in pursuit of perfection. (Sorry that's a bit philosophical, but it seems to work!!)
Dave
You'll certainly do better with a log periodic at the feed than with a dipole. They are very broad, and you would lose over half the signal from a dipole as direct radiation from the front. My experience here is that it is better to get on and try something that might appear sub-optimal than to prevaricate in pursuit of perfection. (Sorry that's a bit philosophical, but it seems to work!!)
Dave
- Wolfie G8VAT
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:56 am
Re: Bit of Engineering nouse pls?...
Thanks Dave, I'll stick with Plan A (A for Antenna? ) for now then...
:
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT
Dah-di-dah
:
Graham G8VAT