Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Digital ATV - The latest generation, cutting edge ATV - Please discuss it all here.
Forum rules
This forum is run by the BATC (British Amateur Television Club), it is service made freely available to all interested parties, please do not abuse this privilege.

Thank you
Post Reply
m0vse
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:55 pm

Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Post by m0vse » Sun Nov 24, 2019 6:40 pm

Hi all.

I have been doing some comparisons of the output of my Jetson Nano + Lime Mini and an SED Starcast DVB-S modulator. Both devices were set to output 2Mbit/s streams on 1700Mhz. I am waiting for a DVB-S2 license for the SED, they have promised me one FOC but it has been a few months so I am limited to DVB-S at the moment.

This is the output from the SED Starcast which is pretty-much perfect I guess?
SED 2mbit.png
SED 2mbit.png (5.27 KiB) Viewed 2814 times
I tried various settings on the Nano, first was using 1 x upsampling and the default gain of 0.8. (using the special FPGA firmware)
Nano 2mbit 1xupsample.png
Nano 2mbit 1xupsample.png (5.68 KiB) Viewed 2814 times
Next I tried 2x
Nano 2mbit 2xupsample.png
Nano 2mbit 2xupsample.png (5.52 KiB) Viewed 2814 times
Followed by 4x. This definitely improves the signal!
Nano 2mbit 4xupsample.png
Nano 2mbit 4xupsample.png (5.52 KiB) Viewed 2814 times
Next I tried reducing the gain setting to 0.6 and this had a dramatic effect. I would say it compares pretty favorably with the SED?
Nano 2mbit 4xupsample and gain 0.6.png
Nano 2mbit 4xupsample and gain 0.6.png (5.43 KiB) Viewed 2814 times
Not sure what conclusions to draw from this test yet but definitely keep the gain down and use upsampling. Also not sure what the peak at the centre frequency is as it is present in all outputs from the Lime?

73 Phil M0VSE

m0vse
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:55 pm

Re: Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Post by m0vse » Sun Nov 24, 2019 6:47 pm

Incidentally, I have just done the test with 2x upsampling and gain at 0.6 and it is almost identical to the 4x upsampling one so this is probably the 'sweetspot'?
Nano 2mbit 2xupsample and gain 0.6.png
Nano 2mbit 2xupsample and gain 0.6.png (5.38 KiB) Viewed 2813 times
Also no peak at the centre frequency???

73 Phil M0VSE

G4WIM
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:36 pm

Re: Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Post by G4WIM » Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:50 pm

Hi Phil,

Good plots with very low shoulders - can be hard to maintain the signal purity by the time you reach the powers needed at work through the satellite !

Not sure about the spikes - maybe needs some IQ calibration ?

73 Tim

G8GKQ
Site Admin
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:21 pm

Re: Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Post by G8GKQ » Mon Nov 25, 2019 9:56 pm

Hi Phil

I would suggest that the spike is because the Lime Mini needs calibration. It shows up on the 4 times upsampling because the main signal power output is 12 dB lower than with no upsampling.

If you are using limesdr_dvb, run it once without the -q switch (but watch the power spike). That will then save a calibration file for you, and you can then try again with -q and it should improve.

Dave, G8GKQ

AdrianH
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:46 pm

Re: Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Post by AdrianH » Tue Nov 26, 2019 1:40 am

Just a basic question, am I correct in seeing a 42.6 dB drop from peak to shoulder. I thought it was 10 dB per vertical division initially so thought I would check?

Adrian

m0vse
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:55 pm

Re: Output of Lime Mini compared to Pro Broadcast

Post by m0vse » Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:55 am

Hi Adrian,

Yes it is a 42-43dB drop, I had auto-scale turned-on which makes it a bit difficult to calculate. This is compared to the 49-50dB drop of the SED Starcast.

One thing I did wonder, as the SED is about 6dB better SNR compared to the Lime, does this mean that I would need 1/4 of the power to get the same signal?

Thanks for the suggestion about calibration Dave, I had been playing with the -q switch so I guess something isn't quite right?

73 Phil M0VSE

Post Reply

Return to “DATV - Digital ATV”