RT5047 U3 and U4

The place for discussion about the 4-channel WinterHill DATV Receiver
g0mjw
Posts: 2346
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:15 am

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by g0mjw » Thu Mar 25, 2021 6:48 pm

Tim,

These are just spares I had from an earlier order. Stock is limited. Hence I think Noel set a limit. I expect most of the price is the postage.

Mike

G0LJF
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G0LJF » Thu Mar 25, 2021 6:53 pm

Hi,

I can only get one at a time....

"You cannot add another "LNB supply PCB for BATC Advanced receiver" to your basket. "

Oh I see - they are limited by the supply.

As for the soldering well its time to try out my new Chinese Hot Air soldering gun. I now need some proper solder paste...

I'll give it a go but a standard soldering Iron would not work I am guessing from the look of things.

Mike

G4EWJ
Posts: 1376
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:11 am

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G4EWJ » Thu Mar 25, 2021 7:10 pm

>>I'll give it a go but a standard soldering Iron would not work I am guessing from the look of things.

I used an Antex CS18 with a 2mm bit for the main and LNB boards and it was fine.

Brian

G4EWJ
Posts: 1376
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:11 am

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G4EWJ » Thu Mar 25, 2021 7:15 pm

I had a conversation with G4KLB a few months ago about the RT5047 and made some notes:

"Farnell have 4 suffix versions: NULL, A, B and BF.

NULL 45ms activation, no fault output
A 45ms activation, fault output
B 6ms activation, no fault output
BF 6ms activation, fault output

BF seems the best, as long as the LNB inrush current doesn't cause it to keep tripping and preventing a startup. I seem to remember that the Octagon OTLSO causes my Pace MSS508 to flash its SHORTED screen briefly, but if that's what was used for the MT MK2 add-on board, it must be OK".

Farnell is on a go-slow at the moment, but I checked earlier and only the B version wasn't on large quantites or long lead times or until exhausted. They had about 150 A versions left.

I'm using the A version.

Brian

g8gtz
Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by g8gtz » Thu Mar 25, 2021 7:15 pm

I think Dave GKQ must have got there before me and set it to maximum order = 2 which should solve the problem.

There 35 orders waiting to be processed and shipped!! Not sure I've got enough jiffy bags - again....

Noel

G0LJF
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G0LJF » Thu Mar 25, 2021 7:25 pm

Brian,

You are no doubt aware that standard metal filament fuses are very very slow in acting - in the order of many seconds if the overload is slight, and I am not sure about the time taken to vapourise (I am not American) the wire if the overload is many times the rating.

Anyhow, I feel that even the longer delay would be sufficient, especially if you consider you are protecting an inductor in the NIM from what I have read, and that, in effect, is a metal wire fuse which should take a long time (relatively) to fuse.

Who knows, I maybe wrong....

20mm Fast-Acting Ceramic Cartridge 1A to 4A

Rating 150% Rating 210% Rating 275% Rating 400% Rating 1000%
60min max 30min max 10ms-2Sec. 3ms-300ms 0-20ms

Mike

G4EWJ
Posts: 1376
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:11 am

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G4EWJ » Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:29 pm

I just tried shorting out the F socket 10 times with the 45ms A version and the NIM survived. The inductor in the NIM is very tiny, so I don't think it would take much to blow it.

Brian

G0LJF
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G0LJF » Fri Mar 26, 2021 1:23 pm

Brian,

That's very brave of you, considering the cost of a NIM.

The RT5047 can manage 550mA output current, maximum, typically it says.
An LNB uses under 250 mA I would say, worst case. Some internet searches say over 300 mA for C Band.

So the Serit inductor should be OK with 250 mA.

So worst case that is a 2:1 overload. So based on my very simple fuse model the NIM would blow in 30 minutes max!

I suspect the NIMs go when the RT5047 is NOT used and a full 12V/18V comes from a high current PSU (as I do).

I maybe wrong.

Mike
Last edited by G0LJF on Sat Mar 27, 2021 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

G4EWJ
Posts: 1376
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:11 am

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G4EWJ » Fri Mar 26, 2021 2:03 pm

It was drawing sparks, so the instantaneous current must have been high. I thought that with the longer 45ms activation time, it might cause a blip on the power supplies, but it carried on working.

It's fairly easy to restore the F socket power. Take the bottom cover off the NIM and the 40 way connector pins are visible. The appropriate pin can be wired to the F socket through a suitable choke. It might even improve the performance at 144 and 433MHz with a better choking arrangement, but I haven't tried.

viewtopic.php?f=105&t=5942&start=10

https://wiki.batc.org.uk/Serit_LNB_DC_supply

A lot of NIMs have a 500mA rating for driving DiSEqC motors. When I designed the PCB for the MiniTiouner BATC MK1 using the Sharp and Eardatek NIMs, I used a 200mA resettable fuse and I couldn't blow inductor in those. The inductor was probably rated for 500mA and more rugged. We used a higher value fuse for the MK1A and MK2 versions, but I didn't repeat the test.

Brian

G0LJF
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2019 5:28 pm

Re: RT5047 U3 and U4

Post by G0LJF » Sat Mar 27, 2021 12:48 pm

Hi All,

I have ordered the relevant parts from Farnell .
I went for the A RT5047. 45 ms of 'protection' delay.
I also selected a different Schottky diode from Farnell as the SS14 is not available in SOD123-FL.
I also note that the 10uH 2.5 A inductor was instantly on back order for some reason.

Here is a modified BOM. Please note there are two Schottky diodes.
RT_Module_Farnell.xlsx
RT5047A Farnell BOM
(961.13 KiB) Downloaded 417 times
73, Mike

Post Reply

Return to “The WinterHill DATV Receiver”