Revised QO-100 DATV Bandplan - Please Read

Latest News and Discussion about the use of the DATV transponder on Es'hail-2
g0mjw
Posts: 2352
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:15 am

Re: Revised QO-100 DATV Bandplan - Please Read

Post by g0mjw » Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:45 am

Perhaps - but add an A or B for the 125 kHz - e.g 25A and 25B

AdrianH
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:46 pm

Re: Revised QO-100 DATV Bandplan - Please Read

Post by AdrianH » Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:03 pm

Not directly related to the channel numbers, but just looking at the blocks in the image. I have to ask why there are not 2 125KHz in a 333 channel, why the offset?

Is it because at the top end, the roll off of the transponder at 10499.5 would render a narrow transmission unusable at that end?

If someone uses channel 32 for a narrow transmission they have effectively blocked channels 31 and 33 for 500 to 250KS. If using channel 33 for 500 to 250 they have taken up 3 narrow channels. Not a criticism just wishing to understand the logic behind it.

Adrian

g0mjw
Posts: 2352
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:15 am

Re: Revised QO-100 DATV Bandplan - Please Read

Post by g0mjw » Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:30 pm

I think Dave has tried to offset the channels so the centre frequencies align for every other channel. By putting the 125 in the gap you can actually have both 333s active and the channel in between without too much degradation. Even better with 2x 250kHz.

M0DTS
Posts: 656
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:03 pm

Re: Revised QO-100 DATV Bandplan - Please Read

Post by M0DTS » Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:52 pm

While i'm updating the bandplan for the QuickTune software i was having a think too..
I'm adding a tooltip to show up/downlink freqs for each 'channel' when you hover over the bandplan.

How about:
1A,2A,3A for the 1MS...
1-14B for the 333Ks
1-27C for the 125Ks

You can then add more letters for different SR Channels.

Rob

Post Reply

Return to “Es’hail-2 - DATV Transponder”