having issues with a helix antenna
having issues with a helix antenna
Im building this antenna on thingiverse
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3903285 When i place the antenna over the lnb Im losing rx signal
I can stick just the dome cover over the lnb and this does not effect the rx signal
I have also retested the PLA in the microwave and no heating of filament
If i just mount the reflector over the lnb no loss of rx signal. but if i mount the helix to the reflector mount and place on the lnb I lose signal
The oscar 100 wb beacon in normal setup Im at a mer of 7.2 on a 1m ofset dish. LNB is a quad octogon pll lnb
with the 2.4ghz mounted the mer drops to 3 and not signal lock.
any suggestions
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3903285 When i place the antenna over the lnb Im losing rx signal
I can stick just the dome cover over the lnb and this does not effect the rx signal
I have also retested the PLA in the microwave and no heating of filament
If i just mount the reflector over the lnb no loss of rx signal. but if i mount the helix to the reflector mount and place on the lnb I lose signal
The oscar 100 wb beacon in normal setup Im at a mer of 7.2 on a 1m ofset dish. LNB is a quad octogon pll lnb
with the 2.4ghz mounted the mer drops to 3 and not signal lock.
any suggestions
Last edited by m1cdq on Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: having issues wiht a helix antenna
It's hardly surprising there is loss when you put a metal coil in front of the LNB. This is why I developed a dual band patch feed.
Re: having issues wiht a helix antenna
I understand that Dave G3ZGZ uses a similar feed which appears to work ok but pretty sure his helix was shorter to lessen the 10GHz signal loss.
Try contacting him for details ?
However a shorter helix may not create a truly CP signal.
Concensus is to use a POTY for best results.
73 Tim
Try contacting him for details ?
However a shorter helix may not create a truly CP signal.
Concensus is to use a POTY for best results.
73 Tim
-
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:46 am
Re: having issues wiht a helix antenna
Interesting discussion. I think I read that the original designer of the Helix assembly found a 1dB improvement over his POTY with this design but anything conductive in a RF field is going to change things......
Gareth
Gareth
Re: having issues wiht a helix antenna
Im chatting with the original designer.
It could be i have the only dish that dont like this type of feed or I have done something wrong that is so obvious i cant see it.
Its all about being a ham. try it to see it it works if not then why , how to improve or fix. or try something else. its all fun
It could be i have the only dish that dont like this type of feed or I have done something wrong that is so obvious i cant see it.
Its all about being a ham. try it to see it it works if not then why , how to improve or fix. or try something else. its all fun
Re: having issues with a helix antenna
Roger
My gut feeling is that the 4dB reduction in SNR that you are seeing when you put the 3 turn helix in front of the LNB feed is exactly what I would expect.
Was the original designer using it for DATV or narrow-band? The link budget for the narrow band transponder is so generous that 4 dB would not be a problem. Not so for the wideband transponder - it is much more critical.
Dave G8GKQ
My gut feeling is that the 4dB reduction in SNR that you are seeing when you put the 3 turn helix in front of the LNB feed is exactly what I would expect.
Was the original designer using it for DATV or narrow-band? The link budget for the narrow band transponder is so generous that 4 dB would not be a problem. Not so for the wideband transponder - it is much more critical.
Dave G8GKQ